‘We’re Full:’ Slain Right Wing Activist Charlie Kirk was No Fan of India or Indian Immigration
- He blamed legal immigration from India for having displaced American workers the most.
Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and prominent conservative commentator, was tragically assassinated in Utah on Wednesday was no fan of India. He often made his stance clear on Indian immigration to the United States, particularly regarding the H-1B visa program. His views reflect a broader conservative debate about skilled immigration and its impact on American workers.
In September 2024, Kirk sparked significant controversy when he posted on social media platform X that “America does not need more visas for people from India.” His statement was part of a broader critique of the H-1B visa system, which primarily benefits highly skilled workers from countries like India.
Kirk’s specific concerns center on what he perceives as displacement of American workers. He argued that “perhaps no form of legal immigration has so displaced American workers as those from India,” adding bluntly, “Enough already. We’re full. Let’s finally put our own people first.”
The conservative activist had consistently framed the H-1B program as a “scam” that undermines American workers.
The H-1B Debate Context
Kirk’s comments came in response to discussions about potential trade deals between the U.S. and India that might involve expanding visa programs. When Fox News host Laura Ingraham suggested that any trade deal with India would likely require offering more visas, Kirk expressed strong agreement with her skeptical stance.
The conservative activist had consistently framed the H-1B program as a “scam” that undermines American workers. His position aligned with a segment of the MAGA movement that views certain legal immigration programs as detrimental to native-born workers, despite the program’s intention to address skill shortages in sectors like technology.
Kirk’s views on Indian immigration reflected his wider “America First” immigration philosophy. He advocated for prioritizing American workers over foreign nationals, regardless of skill level or legal status. This stance puts him at odds with pro-business conservatives who support H-1B visas as necessary for economic competitiveness.
His criticism extended beyond just policy disagreements. Kirk had suggested that the current system allows foreign workers to suppress wages and take opportunities that should go to Americans. He argued that the scale of Indian immigration through skilled worker programs has fundamentally altered the job market in ways that disadvantage U.S. citizens.
Kirk’s statements have resonated with his substantial social media following of over 5 million people across platforms. However, they have also drawn sharp criticism from immigrant advocates and some business leaders who argue that Indian professionals have significantly contributed to American innovation and economic growth, particularly in Silicon Valley.
The debate highlights tensions within conservative politics between populist, worker-focused messaging and traditional pro-business stances on immigration. Kirk represented the populist wing that views skilled immigration skeptically, even when it’s legal and employer-sponsored.